![]() |
![]() |
| Read These Books |
November 3, 2008 Vote, Just Vote
November 2, 2008 Does God Take Sides in Politics? Greg Koukl, the fine Christian apologist at Stand to Reason, says YES. Here is his podcast on the topic from a recent radio broadcast. To go to Stand to Reason to download from their site click here and scroll down to September 21. Here is the transcript of Does God Take Sides in Politics? If you have the time listen to Greg's September 29 podcast portion containing Pro-life Consequences to the Presidential Election which is 00:55:52 into the podcast. It's the Turnout, Part 2 Infoplease.com shows the 2004 voter turnout as a percentage of voter registration at 70%. I initially pegged it at 61% below. My source was a Washington Post article that didn't give the base used. Not their fault. If you use as a base the voting age population, the 2004 figure drops to 55.3%. Interestingly, the US Census Bureau lists the voter turnout as a percentage of voter registration at 88%. But, they go by what people "report", not by the actual figures. It is probably a question on the census form. If people who are filling out the census self-report at 88% for 2004 but the actual figures show 70%, could it be there are more likely voters in polls than in elections. If I am ashamed to admit on a census form that I was registered but didn't vote, wouldn't I be willing to do the same to a pollster. Are the likely voters exaggerated? Perhaps I am missing something in the data. Does anyone see anything I am missing? All in all, 30% of registered who didn't vote in 2004 is a huge pool to draw from for McCain and Palin. Congressman Lamar Smith (R-TX) just mentioned on the Michael Medved show how Evan Thomas saw media bias toward John Kerry in 2004 as being worth 15 points. Smith wondered how that 15 points would look in McCain's column if the media were not so biased. Smith went on to mention the media hasn't yet descended into yellow journalism, whereupon Medved said, "How about Blue Journalism?" Nice turn of a phrase, Michael. October 29, 2008 How about a transcript or an edit? The Los Angeles Times contends that they can't release the "Obama toasting Khalidi" tape because they promised their source they wouldn't. I can respect that and wouldn't expect them to violate their word to the source. My guess is the source doesn't want to implicate the "innocent" in the room and bring them into the controversy. Or, perhaps the source doesn't want to implicate someone else who was there who hasn't been identified. There are two solutions:
It's the Turnout, It's the Turnout Buried within the body politic is the simple solution to the polls showing Sen. Obama ahead of Sen. McCain - turnout. Turnout was quite good in 2004, but still only about 61%. [update: see It's the Turnout, Part 2 above] If pastors alone would preach on Sunday that it is every church member's duty to God to vote on Tuesday, we would overwhelming win the election. If busy mothers would just treat voting next Tuesday as they would a child's doctor's or dentist's appointment, we could overwhelming win. If a mother cares about not missing a child's sporting event, because she wants to be there to support her child, how can she miss voting that supports a safer America and gives her child more freedom and opportunity for its future.. October 25, 2008 Patrick Ruffini (via Instapundit), Mark Steyn (via Powerline), and Bill Dyer (Beldar) are looking into the disabling of credit card security features at Team Obama headquarters. I see three main points:
The McCain campaign should hammer on this, especially with the American voter's fear of identity theft. This is something they can relate to. Obama has already gone back on his promise to accept public financing. This multiplies the offense if it is true. October 21, 2008 Three Crisises, Not One The McCain campaign would do well to point out to the voters just what America has been through during the long presidential campaign.
John McCain and Sarah Palin should remind the voter what he has been through this past year and how quickly today's financial crisis may turn back to high gasoline prices or a move from Russia or Iran. Under Obama there will likely be no new nuclear plants, no offshore drilling, and a weak front to present to Putin. Biden's Choice Senator Biden's comments at a Seattle fundraiser are causing a stir, as they should. Bill Kristol and Hugh Hewitt are taking the comments as a sign from Biden that a President Obama will flinch at the test, with said test coming from Iran. I have a different take. What if Biden means that Obama will do the right thing to defend America and its allies and that these actions will be seen by the Left as "wrong" or "unpopular" actions. This is the way Rush is seeing it, too. To paraphrase Rush this morning, "Biden is begging their supporters to not do to them what they did to Bush." If this is the case, Biden is saying the Democratic party is a massive fraud for turning on Bush the way they did. Whosoever's read is right, one thing is for sure - Biden has given the McCain campaign a softball to hit out of the park. If Biden is broadcasting they are going to let Iran be Iran, they risk showing the Jewish Democrat, who is symphathetic to Israel, that they are not pro-Israel. If they do what needs to be done, they risk an even bigger rift with the anti-war Left. Far better for the independent and Reagan Democrat, and some Hillary Democrats, to go with the sure choice - McCain & Palin. With them you get a safe America and a protected Israel. October 16, 2008 Joe the Plumber interview Via Instapundit, Gateway Pundit has the link to the post debate interview with Joe the Plumber. McCain Wins Debate A few points of note on the last debate. This format was the best for McCain. It was the follow-up that helped. I thought McCain had Obama on the ropes over abortion. Too bad Bob Schieffer had to cut it short to go to education. McCain did well with that segment, too. Abortion has been the silent issue this election. Too bad. It is a winner when the Democrats have to twist themselves in knots over partial birth abortion. I think Obama is very vulnerable here. Finally, my heart leapt when McCain went after big government. With so many government solutions - Bush 41 and Bush 43 "doling" them out with the Democrats - it is heartening to hear echoes of Ronald Reagan's voice again. McCain should pound this theme time and time again over the remaining days. October 7, 2008 Senator Obama and His Former Friends - A Point Most are Missing Much has been written about Senator Obama and his past association with William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, and Michael Pfleger. Senator Obama has distanced himself from these associations after they were brought to the public - usually by a conservative source, not a MSM one. The typical response from the Obama campaign and Senator Obama's defenders - including MSM - has one over-riding ambition: to make it appear that Senator Obama is the one who has been victimized by his associate's actions and beliefs; that Senator Obama is their superior and he is properly chastising them. But consider this. A few years ago Senator Obama was only a state senator. Before that, he was a community organizer. It was Barack Obama who had the ambition and needed as many legs up as he could handle. Thus, Ayers, Wright, and Rezko. All three of these men were already men of power and influence. It was Obama who needed them, not the other way around. And, you might say it was they who had well formed agendas and saw in Obama someone who could help advance those agendas. Let us not think it was the other way around - that Obama was this great politician and men such as Ayers, Wright, and Rezko worked to attach themselves to him. Did Ayers and Wright sense in Obama a fellow traveler - one who believed in the same things as they. But, here is the difference. Obama was fresh and hadn't had to dirty himself yet to get where he was going. By knowing he had higher office in mind, Obama knew he had to keep his rhetoric cleaner than his beliefs and actions. Thus, Obama's condemnations of his associates appear believable to those who want to believe. But, dig just a little.... When Obama saw the way opening for a wildly preposterous presidential run he decided to take it. No doubt someone who had to spend a few terms in the US Senate before contemplating a presidential run would have put time between himself and his former associates and offered newer, cleaner associations to the voters. Had the Democrats run their primaries more like the general election, Senator Clinton would have been the nominee. Thus, it is a series of chance events that have us contemplating a candidate who is not presidential material. Indeed, had MSM's dislike for the Clintons, and the Republicans, not been what it was, they could have made short work of Obama. Barack Obama is fortunate in his good luck. I am curious to learn, if it can be learned, on whether Senator Obama has the same termperament as Ayers and Wright or whether he simply found them useful. Is Shelby Steele's theory in play or is Barack Obama a cold and calculating ego waiting to see what real power will bring? Or, something altogether different.
|
Gladiator
CD contains "The Battle"The
Dennis Prager Show's Theme Song |