Read These Books

 




The Blog

November 3, 2008

Vote, Just Vote

  1. You have heard about new registered voters excited about voting for Obama. But you, dear reader, can counter this by simply showing up or voting absentee. Remember, it is turnout as a percentage that is key. The needed votes are there in the pool of registered voters. In fact, they are there to give a landslide. You just have to turnout. Too often, too many registered Republicans don't show up to vote.
  2. If you are a practicing Catholic or Evangelical, it is a form of obedience to God to do the right thing. Don't buy into the idea that God stays out of politics. Go listen to "Does God Take Sides in Politics" by Greg Koukl at www.str.org if you want to hear a convincing argument that this is so.
  3. If you block out the time just as you would a dentist or doctor appointment, and isn't it more important than those, you will have no problem following through. Make no excuses. Don't say your vote doesn't count. It does.
  4. If you can't make your way through all the ballot, absentee or in person, it is okay to just fill out what you know. In California, if you do no more than vote Yes on Prop 8, Yes on Prop 6, and McCain and Palin, you will have done a lot. Don't worry about leaving races blank. Your ballot is fully acceptable even if it it isn't all filled out.
  5. If you live in a swing state, such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, or Colorado, it is even more vital you vote. Don't leave it to others. The best revenge to the MSM is to prove them wrong. They are counting on a typical Republican turnout, while cheerleading swollen Democratic registration. Surprise them.
  6. Bring your kids if no one is available to watch them.  They will have fun. Go separately from your spouse if he or she is stuck at work, or running late.
  7. If this is your first time voting, don't be shy.  Poll workers are there to help.
  8. If you are approached by someone asking you if you would like to participate in an exit poll, say yes. This cuts down the chance there will be skewed exit polls that might favor Obama and discourage people who planned on voting later in the day. It is guessed that Democrats fill out exit polls more often, thus skewing the results. It has also been posited that young exit pollsters polling during the Bush-Kerry election seemed to find certain types of voters more approachable. These more approachable people tended to be Democrats, thus a skewed poll.
  9. If you get a call from a polling company, take it. This may make a more accurate poll. It has been said that Democrats are more likely to take phone polls than Republicans, thus a skewed poll can result.
  10. There is nothing greater you can do for your country and your children than to vote this year. Think of the investment your vote represents in a safe, secure, and strong America.  There are millions of people who never miss the chance to vote against your values.  They take it very seriously to defeat you.  Defeat them, instead, by voting.
  11. Think of your vote as preventive medicine. You vote forestalls a host of ailments and disease a country can experience.

November 2, 2008

Does God Take Sides in Politics?

Greg Koukl, the fine Christian apologist at Stand to Reason, says YESHere is his podcast on the topic from a recent radio broadcast.  To go to Stand to Reason to download from their site click here and scroll down to September 21.

Here is the transcript of Does God Take Sides in Politics?

If you have the time listen to Greg's September 29 podcast portion containing Pro-life Consequences to the Presidential Election which is 00:55:52 into the podcast.

October 31, 2008

It's the Turnout, Part 2

Infoplease.com shows the 2004 voter turnout as a percentage of voter registration at 70%.  I initially pegged it at 61% below. My source was a Washington Post article that didn't give the base used.  Not their fault.

If you use as a base the voting age population, the 2004 figure drops to 55.3%.  Interestingly, the US Census Bureau lists the voter turnout as a percentage of voter registration at 88%.  But, they go by what people "report", not by the actual figures.  It is probably a question on the census form.  If people who are filling out the census self-report at 88% for 2004 but the actual figures show 70%, could it be there are more likely voters in polls than in elections.  If I am ashamed to admit on a census form that I was registered but didn't vote,  wouldn't I be willing to do the same to a pollster.  Are the likely voters exaggerated?

Perhaps I am missing something in the data.  Does anyone see anything I am missing?

All in all, 30% of registered who didn't vote in 2004 is a huge pool to draw from for McCain and Palin.

October 31, 2008

Congressman Lamar Smith (R-TX) just mentioned on the Michael Medved show how Evan Thomas saw media bias toward John Kerry in 2004 as being worth 15 points.  Smith wondered how that 15 points would look in McCain's column if the media were not so biased.  Smith went on to mention the media hasn't yet descended into yellow journalism, whereupon Medved said, "How about Blue Journalism?"  Nice turn of a phrase, Michael.

October 29, 2008

How about a transcript or an edit?

The Los Angeles Times contends that they can't release the "Obama toasting Khalidi" tape because they promised their source they wouldn't.  I can respect that and wouldn't expect them to violate their word to the source.

My guess is the source doesn't want to implicate the "innocent" in the room and bring them into the controversy.  Or, perhaps the source doesn't want to implicate someone else who was there who hasn't been identified.

There are two solutions:

  1. The LA Times can release a full transcript of the tape.  Apparently, this would not violate the source's request that the video not be released.
  2. The LA Times can approach the source and request a reversal of his request or to accede to a request to sit in on an edit of the tape that will provide the gist of the toast and Obama comments but will not reveal what he didn't want revealed.

October 27, 2008

It's the Turnout, It's the Turnout

Buried within the body politic is the simple solution to the polls showing Sen. Obama ahead of Sen. McCain - turnout.  Turnout was quite good in 2004, but still only about 61%. [update: see It's the Turnout, Part 2 above]

If pastors alone would preach on Sunday that it is every church member's duty to God to vote on Tuesday, we would overwhelming win the election.

If busy mothers would just treat voting next Tuesday as they would a child's doctor's or dentist's appointment, we could overwhelming win.  If a mother cares about not missing a child's sporting event, because she wants to be there to support her child, how can she miss voting that supports a safer America and gives her child more freedom and opportunity for its future..

October 25, 2008

Patrick Ruffini (via Instapundit), Mark Steyn (via Powerline), and Bill Dyer (Beldar) are looking into the disabling of credit card security features at Team Obama headquarters.

I see three main points:

  1. If it was your intention to skirt the legally allowed limit per person, this is how you could do it.  There can be no other reason, I can think of, to disable the security features.   Why would, as the Obama campaign is stating, you rely on human verification later, when a computer can do all the work before hand?  Word is coming in that they are not doing the human verification, anyway.

  2. Unless I am missing something, by disabling the security features, they are opening themselves up to the real garden variety credit card fraud - this means any and every credit card would be accepted - yours, mine, anyone's.  It would then be up to you to fight to get it off your credit card statement.  In the era of identity theft, would you want to do business with a company that didn't use basic security checks?
     
  3. Why are the credit card companies allowing this?  Surely it opens them up to fraud.  Could it be they are unaware?  Could it be the fees they are making are causing them to look the other way?  Could it be Senator Biden, dubbed the The Senator from MBNA by Byron York, is their guy and their guy at Number One Observatory Circle couldn't be bad?  Is this a common practice?  What is their position?  I want to be fair.  As Prager always says, "Tell the truth first, then give your opinion."

The McCain campaign should hammer on this, especially with the American voter's fear of identity theft.  This is something they can relate to.  Obama has already gone back on his promise to accept public financing.  This multiplies the offense if it is true.

October 21, 2008

Three Crisises, Not One

The McCain campaign would do well to point out to the voters just what America has been through during the long presidential campaign.

  1. A huge spike in gasoline prices - the public was frustrated and furious.  The Republicans and their Drill Baby Drill and Drill Here Now battle cries won the day.
  2. Russia invades Georgia.  This focused the voter's eye on what a dangerous world we live in if Russia has designs on empire again.  McCain wins this one.
  3. The financial crisis.  As calmer heads are prevailing, sometimes the same heads that initially panicked, we are seeing some return to normalcy.  The Dems and Obama clearly triumphed here as the public seemed to be blaming President Bush, even though Fannie's and Freddie's benefactors were clearly pointed out as Democrats, and the whole world was going through the same crisis.  What first seemed horrible timing, one can see how by November 4th, voters will be sufficiently calm to realize it is a volatile world and they can't risk an Obama presidency.

John McCain and Sarah Palin should remind the voter what he has been through this past year and how quickly today's financial crisis may turn back to high gasoline prices or a move from Russia or Iran.  Under Obama there will likely be no new nuclear plants, no offshore drilling, and a weak front to present to Putin. 

Biden's Choice

Senator Biden's comments at a Seattle fundraiser are causing a stir, as they should.  Bill Kristol and Hugh Hewitt are taking the comments as a sign from Biden that a President Obama will flinch at the test, with said test coming from Iran.  I have a different take.

What if Biden means that Obama will do the right thing to defend America and its allies and that these actions will be seen by the Left as "wrong" or "unpopular" actions.  This is the way Rush is seeing it, too.  To paraphrase Rush this morning, "Biden is begging their supporters to not do to them what they did to Bush."  If this is the case, Biden is saying the Democratic party is a massive fraud for turning on Bush the way they did.

Whosoever's read is right, one thing is for sure - Biden has given the McCain campaign a softball to hit out of the park.  If Biden is broadcasting they are going to let Iran be Iran, they risk showing the Jewish Democrat, who is symphathetic to Israel, that they are not pro-Israel.  If they do what needs to be done, they risk an even bigger rift with the anti-war Left.

Far better for the independent and Reagan Democrat, and some Hillary Democrats, to go with the sure choice - McCain & Palin.  With them you get a safe America and a protected Israel. 

October 16, 2008

Joe the Plumber interview

Via Instapundit, Gateway Pundit has the link to the post debate interview with Joe the Plumber.

McCain Wins Debate

A few points of note on the last debate.  This format was the best for McCain.  It was the follow-up that helped. 

I thought McCain had Obama on the ropes over abortion.  Too bad Bob Schieffer had to cut it short to go to education. McCain did well with that segment, too.  Abortion has been the silent issue this election.  Too bad.  It is a winner when the Democrats have to twist themselves in knots over partial birth abortion.  I think Obama is very vulnerable here.

Finally, my heart leapt when McCain went after big government.  With so many government solutions - Bush 41 and Bush 43 "doling" them out with the Democrats - it is heartening to hear echoes of Ronald Reagan's voice again.  McCain should pound this theme time and time again over the remaining days.

October 7, 2008

Senator Obama and His Former Friends - A Point Most are Missing

Much has been written about Senator Obama and his past association with William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, and Michael Pfleger.  Senator Obama has distanced himself from these associations after they were brought to the public - usually by a conservative source, not a MSM one.

The typical response from the Obama campaign and Senator Obama's defenders - including MSM - has one over-riding ambition: to make it appear that Senator Obama is the one who has been victimized by his associate's actions and beliefs; that Senator Obama is their superior and he is properly chastising them.

But consider this.  A few years ago Senator Obama was only a state senator.  Before that, he was a community organizer.  It was Barack Obama who had the ambition and needed as many legs up as he could handle.  Thus, Ayers, Wright, and Rezko.  All three of these men were already men of power and influence.  It was Obama who needed them, not the other way around.  And, you might say it was they who had well formed agendas and saw in Obama someone who could help advance those agendas.  Let us not think it was the other way around - that Obama was this great politician and men such as Ayers, Wright, and Rezko worked to attach themselves to him. 

Did Ayers and Wright sense in Obama a fellow traveler - one who believed in the same things as they.  But, here is the difference.  Obama was fresh and hadn't had to dirty himself yet to get where he was going.  By knowing he had higher office in mind, Obama knew he had to keep his rhetoric cleaner than his beliefs and actions.  Thus, Obama's condemnations of his associates appear believable to those who want to believe.  But, dig just a little....

When Obama saw the way opening for a wildly preposterous presidential run he decided to take it.  No doubt someone who had to spend a few terms in the US Senate before contemplating a presidential run would have put time between himself and his former associates and offered newer, cleaner associations to the voters.  Had the Democrats run their primaries more like the general election, Senator Clinton would have been the nominee.  Thus, it is a series of chance events that have us contemplating a candidate who is not presidential material.

Indeed, had MSM's dislike for the Clintons, and the Republicans, not been what it was, they could have made short work of Obama.  Barack Obama is fortunate in his good luck.

I am curious to learn, if it can be learned, on whether Senator Obama has the same termperament as Ayers and Wright or whether he simply found them useful.  Is Shelby Steele's theory in play or is Barack Obama a cold and calculating ego waiting to see what real power will bring?  Or, something altogether different.

 

 

(2007 through August 2008 archives)

(2006 archives)

(2005 archives)

Iron Sharpening Iron

       
 

Gladiator CD contains "The Battle"The Dennis Prager Show's Theme Song

 


Banner S